Case 2501713/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs C White v Mr Lakh Dhami T/A Yarm Post Office — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501713/2020
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs C White
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Johnson determined the claim on the papers. The tribunal found that Mrs C White had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice, and ordered Mr Lakh Dhami T/A Yarm Post Office to pay damages of £444.72.
The tribunal also found that Mrs White had been dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £592.96. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims are recorded in the judgment text provided.
The hearing listed for 27 November 2020 was cancelled following the Rule 21 judgment. The total monetary awards recorded in the judgment are £444.72 and £592.96, making a combined total of £1,037.68.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £444.72. | Upheld | — | £445 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment of £592.96. | Upheld | — | £593 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,038
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.