Case 2501715/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms K Green v Harrogate and District NHS Foundation Trust — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501715/2021
- Decision date
- 1 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Miss B Kirby, Mrs P Wright
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms K Green
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs Green worked as an administration assistant in the Trust's 0-19 service. The respondent accepted that she was disabled by sleep apnoea, anxiety and depression, and COPD, and accepted knowledge of sleep apnoea and anxiety and depression. The tribunal found that from September 2020 she was experiencing extreme tiredness, lack of energy and problems with memory, understanding and judgement, and that those symptoms were at least partly due to sleep apnoea. The Trust used sickness absence, capability and disciplinary policies, with occupational health referrals, risk assessments, an action plan and a phased return to work.
On the section 15 complaints, the tribunal found that Mrs Havelock did not reprimand or tell Ms Green off for falling asleep, and that the supervision meetings and performance discussions were conducted supportively. It held that the management steps were not unfavourable treatment. In any event, the sickness and capability measures were found to pursue legitimate aims, including managing attendance, performance and service-user safety, and to be proportionate. The same reasoning applied to the sickness absence review meetings held after the September 2020 absence and again after the July 2021 absence.
On reasonable adjustments, the tribunal applied the Griffiths approach and held that the broad sickness absence, capability and disciplinary policies themselves did not put Ms Green at a substantial disadvantage. It accepted that a requirement to maintain satisfactory attendance and performance could disadvantage a disabled employee whose disability caused more absence or underperformance, but it held that it was not reasonable to require the Trust to ignore disability-related absences or performance issues. The policies already contained safeguards, including occupational health input, reasonable-adjustment considerations and staged reviews, and the Trust was entitled to monitor whether adjustments were working.
On dismissal, the tribunal found that the respondent had reasonable and proper cause for the actions relied on as breaches of trust and confidence, including monitoring performance, placing Ms Green on an action plan, referring her to occupational health, and contacting the DVLA and police after she continued driving against occupational health advice. It accepted that the failure to provide Access to Work equipment was an oversight and that a 14 May 2021 email suggested falling asleep would be treated as conduct, but held that these matters did not, alone or together, destroy the employment relationship. Ms Green resigned on 18 August 2021, but the tribunal held that she had not been constructively dismissed, so the unfair dismissal, wrongful dismissal and discriminatory dismissal claims also failed. No monetary award was made.
Claims and outcomes
9 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Alleged discriminatory dismissal arising from the same conduct said to amount to constructive dismissal and disability discrimination. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 complaint alleging Mrs Havelock reprimanded or criticised Ms Green from August 2020 because of sleepiness, performance deterioration, or perceived poor performance. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 complaint alleging the respondent subjected Ms Green to capability management with risk of dismissal and an action plan because of disability-related effects. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Section 15 complaint alleging the sickness absence policy was applied to Ms Green because of disability-related absence, with risk of dismissal. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments in relation to its disciplinary procedure. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint that the respondent failed to make reasonable adjustments in relation to its sickness absence procedure. |
Legal tests applied
9 references- Shamoon detriment test
- De Souza v Automobile Association detriment formulation
- Environment Agency v Rowan
- Griffiths v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions PCP formulation
- s.136 Equality Act 2010 burden of proof
- Hardys & Hansons proportionality test
- s.95(1)(c) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Woods/Mahmud implied term of trust and confidence
- Omilaju last straw test
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.