Case 2501716/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Brannan v Testerworld Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501716/2022
- Decision date
- 31 October 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Brannan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant complained under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 that the respondent failed to comply with section 188 collective consultation requirements in respect of his redundancy dismissal. The respondent was in administration, its administrators consented to the claim continuing, and no response was presented.
The Tribunal found on the available material that, as at 9 May 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at the identified sites or depots. The claimant was an affected employee and was dismissed as redundant on 5 August 2022. The Tribunal found there was no recognised independent trade union for the relevant employees, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, and no section 188 representatives elected because the respondent did not invite affected employees to elect them.
The Tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with section 188 and had not shown special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable. Having regard to the seriousness of the default and GMB v Susie Radin Ltd, the Tribunal found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, and made a protective award for the maximum 90-day protected period beginning on 5 August 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The complaint under section 189 TULRCA 1992 was well founded because the respondent failed to comply with collective consultation requirements under section 188 in respect of redundancy dismissals. The judgment made a protective award of remuneration for a 90-day protected period, but did not state a monetary figure. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A(1) Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 292A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180, [2004] IRLR 400
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.