Case 2501716/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Goodings v Miramar 246 Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501716/2023
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Goodings
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Goodings was employed by Miramar 246 Limited from 26 August 2020 to 3 May 2023 as a Duty Manager. He was dismissed without prior warning or notice by reason of redundancy. The respondent did not present a response, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure on the available material. The tribunal recorded that he was 22 years old at dismissal, had two complete years of service, worked an average of 33 hours a week at £10.18 an hour, and had gross weekly pay of £336.
All five claims succeeded. The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages in the gross sum of £1,363.31 for unpaid hours in the four weeks before dismissal, holiday pay of £1,025 for 100.76 hours of untaken leave under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations, breach of contract damages of £612 for two weeks' notice, and a statutory redundancy payment of £336 calculated at 0.5 week's pay for each full year worked while under 22. The unfair dismissal claim also succeeded, but the tribunal made no compensatory award and recorded that the basic award was negated by the statutory redundancy payment. The total amount ordered was £3,336.31.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction of wages and ordered payment of the gross sum of £1,363.31 for unpaid hours in the four weeks before dismissal. | Upheld | — | £1,363 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found accrued but untaken holiday pay was due under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations and ordered payment of £1,025 for 100.76 hours of untaken leave. | Upheld | — | £1,025 |
| Breach of contract | The breach of contract claim concerned failure to give two weeks' notice, and damages of £612 were awarded. | Upheld | — | £612 |
| Redundancy | The tribunal found the statutory redundancy payment was due and calculated it at £336, using 0.5 week's pay for each full year worked while under age 22. | Upheld | — | £336 |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal claim succeeded, but the tribunal made no compensatory award and said the basic award was negated by the statutory redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,336
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £0
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £0
- compensatory remedy recorded
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.