Case 2501717/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss N Brown v North East Tutoring Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501717/2022
- Decision date
- 4 January 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss N Brown
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss N Brown’s complaint of unlawful deduction of wages against North East Tutoring Ltd was upheld. The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £1,492.63 in total, comprising £1,194.10 as arrears of pay and a £298.53 uplift under section 207A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992, which the judgment describes as a 25% uplift on the amount awarded in paragraph (a).
The hearing was held remotely at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 3 January 2023 before Employment Judge Sweeney. The judgment records that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would follow unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the unlawful deduction of wages complaint and ordered payment of £1,492.63, made up of £1,194.10 arrears of pay and a £298.53 uplift under section 207A TULR(C)A 1992. | Upheld | — | £1,493 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,493
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.