Case 2501720/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Samuel Buckley v Green Supplier Limited (in administration) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501720/2021
- Decision date
- 26 August 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Samuel Buckley
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at the Employment Tribunal at Newcastle upon Tyne, listed to take place remotely by Cloud Video Platform, on 26 August 2022 before Employment Judge Heather. The Claimant did not attend and did not respond to an email from the Tribunal Office asking him to do so. The Tribunal waited until 11:00am before deciding the matter.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective Award under section 189(3) of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. Dismissed because the Claimant did not provide documents or evidence, did not attend the hearing, and did not respond to the Tribunal's email. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Claim for failure to pay notice pay. Dismissed under rule 47 for non-compliance and non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim for unauthorised deduction of wages. Dismissed under rule 47 for non-compliance and non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Claim for non-payment of holiday pay. Dismissed under rule 47 for non-compliance and non-attendance. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.