Case 2501724/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Tate v Mike Rogerson Estate Agents — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501724/2022
- Decision date
- 29 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Tate
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal held that Mr H Tate did not have two years' service with Mike Rogerson Estate Agents. On that basis, it found that the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim.
The claim was therefore dismissed. The written record notes that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found that the claimant did not have two years' service and therefore the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.