Case 2501742/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr N Morgan v Northumberland County Council — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501742/2023
- Decision date
- 24 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram
- Venue
- Newcastle
- Panel members
- Mr D Morgan, Ms A Tarn
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr N Morgan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr N Morgan brought a complaint of direct disability discrimination against Northumberland County Council. The case was heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 19, 20 and 21 June 2024 before Employment Judge Jeram, with Mr D Morgan and Ms A Tarn sitting as the other tribunal members.
The judgment records only the tribunal's conclusion that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well founded. It was therefore dismissed.
The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested. No monetary remedy was awarded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The written record states that the complaint of direct disability discrimination was not well founded. Reasons were given orally at the hearing; no written reasons were provided in the published record. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.