Case 2501743/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms W Scott v Red Amber Archer Ltd — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501743/2023
- Decision date
- 1 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms W Scott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs W Scott's claims against Red Amber Archer Ltd were heard at Newcastle Employment Tribunal via CVP before Employment Judge Jeram, with no attendance for the respondent. The tribunal held that her claims for redundancy pay, holiday pay and notice pay were well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal awarded redundancy pay of £4,725.00 gross, notice pay of £1,890.00 gross and holiday pay of £193.73 gross. It also found that, at the time proceedings were commenced, the claimant had not been provided with a statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1(1) ERA 1996, and awarded a further £315.00, described as two weeks' gross pay. The total award was £7,123.73 gross.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £4,725 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £194 |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay awarded in the gross sum of £1,890.00. | Upheld | — | £1,890 |
| Other | Further award of two weeks' gross pay because the claimant had not been provided with a statement of employment particulars contrary to section 1(1) ERA 1996 when proceedings were commenced. | Upheld | — | £315 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,124
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.