Case 2501752/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr L Daniels v Kingly Solicitors Ltd. t/a Coles Solicitors (in voluntary liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501752/2020
- Decision date
- 1 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Newburn Members
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr L Daniels
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr L Daniels brought claims against Kingly Solicitors Ltd t/a Coles Solicitors, which was in voluntary liquidation and did not attend. At the outset he withdrew the compensatory element of his unfair dismissal claim, and the tribunal noted there was no stay under section 112 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The unfair dismissal claim was therefore recorded as dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal found that Daniels had been employed from 1 April 2019 as a solicitor on a contract entitling him to 3 months' notice, 24 days' holiday plus bank holidays, travel expenses for work journeys, and a contractual bonus of 10% of fees billed over target. Following the SRA intervention on 12 August 2020, the respondent's offices closed immediately and Daniels was dismissed by reason of redundancy without warning, consultation or notice. The tribunal accepted that he had taken 9 days' leave, and that no payment had been made on termination for notice, accrued holiday, expenses, the bonus, or wages for 1 to 12 August 2020.
The tribunal upheld the breach of contract claim for notice pay, holiday pay, expenses and the contractual bonus. It calculated notice pay at £5,887.18 net plus £265.19 employer pension contributions after deducting the Redundancy Payments Service payment, holiday pay at £215.54, expenses at £123.75, and the bonus at £12,591.69, giving £19,083.35. It also upheld the unlawful deduction from wages claim for the unpaid August wages and awarded £1,000.72 plus £83.04 employer pension contributions. No ACAS uplift was made because the tribunal found the respondent could not reasonably have engaged with the Code after 12 August 2020.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Withdrawn by the claimant at the start of the hearing; the tribunal recorded the claim as dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Succeeded in respect of notice pay, accrued holiday pay, unpaid expenses and the contractual bonus under the Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994. | Upheld | — | £19,083 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Succeeded for unpaid wages for 1 August 2020 to 12 August 2020 plus employer pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,084 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £20,167
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
5 references- Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- University of Sunderland v Droussou
- s.207A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- ACAS Code of Practice on Disciplinary and Grievance Procedures
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.