Case 2501755/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Hoy v Absolute Quality Care Limited (In Voluntary Liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501755/2022
- Decision date
- 22 November 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Members
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
- Panel members
- Ms L Jackson, Mr P Chapman
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Hoy
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant’s holiday pay claim was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. The tribunal found the unfair dismissal claim under section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well founded and awarded a basic award of £736.00 and a compensatory award of £1,588.50, making a grand total of £2,324.50. The prescribed element was £1,588.50 for the period from 24 September 2021 to 18 November 2021, and the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 applied.
The tribunal also found the claimant’s section 15 Equality Act 2010 discrimination claim well founded and ordered compensation of £7,104.05. The total award was £9,428.55. The written record states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Claim brought pursuant to section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Awarded a basic award of £736.00 and a compensatory award of £1,588.50, making a grand total of £2,324.50. The prescribed element was £1,588.50 for the period 24 September 2021 to 18 November 2021, and the Employment Protection (Recoupment of Jobseekers Allowance & Income Support) Regulations 1996 applied. | Upheld | — | £2,325 |
| Disability discrimination | Claim found well-founded under section 15 of the Equality Act 2010. The tribunal ordered compensation of £7,104.05. | Upheld | Disability | £7,104 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £9,429
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £736
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £1,589
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
2 references- section 98 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 15 of the Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.