Case 2501760/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss S Docherty v Energie Fitness — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501760/2021
- Decision date
- 29 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss S Docherty
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claim was issued in the Newcastle Employment Tribunals on 15 November 2021. The respondent, Energie Fitness, failed to present a valid response on time, and Employment Judge Martin determined the claim under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The listed hearing on 12 April 2022 was cancelled as a result.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from Miss S Docherty's wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £850 gross to the claimant. No separate split of the award into different heads of loss was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment. The tribunal found the respondent had made unauthorised deductions from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £850 gross. | Upheld | — | £850 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £850
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.