Case 2501771/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs J Lowery v Mr L Dhami t/a Yarm Post Office — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501771/2020
- Decision date
- 24 November 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Aspden REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs J Lowery
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal, sitting before Employment Judge Aspden, found that Mrs J Lowery was entitled to a redundancy payment under the Employment Rights Act 1996 in the sum of £2,537.10. That claim was upheld in full.
The tribunal also upheld her complaint that Mr L Dhami t/a Yarm Post Office breached her contract of employment by terminating it without notice. It awarded £1,014.84 as damages for breach of contract. In addition, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to pay the amount due under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 for accrued but untaken annual leave, and ordered payment of £84.57, being the amount due.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,537 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,015 |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £85 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,637
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.