Case 2501774/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Chubb v Refreshingly Retro Ltd (In Liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501774/2022
- Decision date
- 3 February 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge AEPitt Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Chubb
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr Chubb worked for Refreshingly Retro Ltd as a welder/fabricator from 8 August 2022. He was told he would work a 40-hour week at £13.22 per hour. Some weeks later he was handed a written contract containing clause 13, which allowed the respondent to deduct notice pay from final wages if he left without notice. The tribunal found that he objected to that term, was told he would not be paid if he did not sign, and only signed because of that pressure. It concluded that the clause had no effect because his agreement was obtained under duress.
The tribunal also found that, in any event, the respondent was in breach of the fundamental implied term of trust and confidence, which entitled the claimant to leave his employment. It accepted that by September 2022 the claimant had become concerned about the respondent's position and about the treatment he received in connection with his tools and his employment. On that basis, the tribunal treated the claimant's case as one for unlawful deductions from wages comprising unpaid wages and unpaid holiday pay.
The tribunal held that the unlawful deductions claim was made out under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. It also referred to sections 23 and 24 of the same Act as the basis for recovery of the unpaid sums and associated financial loss. It awarded £2,644 gross for unpaid wages, £264 gross for holiday pay not paid on termination, and £421.75 for losses sustained because the wages were not paid, producing a total award of £3,329.75.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £2,644 gross for unpaid wages. It also awarded £421.75 for losses sustained as a result of the failure to pay wages, described in the reasons as interest/cash withdrawal losses. | Upheld | — | £2,644 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal awarded £264 gross for holiday pay not paid when employment ceased. | Upheld | — | £264 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,330
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 23 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 24 Employment Rights Act 1996
- fundamental implied term of trust and confidence
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.