Case 2501786/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Kirby & others (see schedule) v Vale of Mowbray Limited (in administration) — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501786/2022
- Decision date
- 19 April 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Kirby & others (see schedule)
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal determined the claims under Rule 21 because the respondent had not presented a response and the administrators had consented to the claims continuing. It found that, as at 28 September 2022, the respondent was proposing to dismiss as redundant 20 or more employees within 90 days or less at its Leeming Bar site, and that the claimants were affected employees who were dismissed as redundant on that date.
The tribunal found that the respondent was required to consult appropriate representatives and provide the information required by section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. It found there was no recognised independent trade union, no existing employee representatives with authority to be consulted, no elected representatives for section 188 purposes, no invitation to elect representatives, and no individual consultation with the claimants.
The tribunal held the section 189 complaints well founded and made a protective award for each claimant. It found there had been no consultation at all and no mitigating circumstances, so the just and equitable protected period was the maximum 90 days, beginning with each claimant's own dismissal on 28 September 2022.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | The tribunal found the claimants' complaints under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 well founded and made a protective award equivalent to 90 days' remuneration for each claimant beginning on 28 September 2022. No monetary amount was stated. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
6 references- section 188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 189 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- GMB v Susie Radin Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 180
- E Green & Son (Castings) Ltd v Association of Scientific, Technical & Managerial Staffs [1984] IRLR 135
- TGWU v Ledbury Preserves [1986] IRLR 494
- Independent Insurance Company Ltd v Aspinall [2011] IRLR 723
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.