Case 2501792/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss C Toogood v Inn Trade solutions Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501792/2021
- Decision date
- 18 January 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss C Toogood
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss C Toogood presented an ET1 on 23 November 2021. The claim was sent to Inn Trade Solutions Limited on 30 November 2021, and no response was received by the deadline of 28 December 2021. The tribunal therefore entered judgment under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013 on the basis of the claim form and the information supplied by the claimant.
The tribunal amended the respondent's title to Inn Trade Solutions Limited and found the claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 to be well-founded. The reasons record that this claim related to 10 days' unpaid wages for holiday taken between 13 September 2021 and 24 September 2021.
The tribunal also found the claimant's claim for accrued and outstanding holiday pay under Regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 to be well-founded. The tribunal stated that the holiday pay claim would be quantified at the remedy hearing, so no monetary figure was recorded in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment says the claim relates to 10 days' unpaid wages for holiday taken from 13 September 2021 to 24 September 2021. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the accrued and outstanding holiday pay claim well-founded and stated that it would be quantified at the remedy hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.