Case 2501817/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Mr G Simmonds v My Staff Direct Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501817/2022
- Decision date
- 9 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr G Simmonds
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dealt with remedy only. Liability for accrued, untaken holiday pay under Regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations had already been sent to the parties on 9 December 2022, and this hearing on 5 January 2023 was to determine the amount payable. The respondent did not attend. The claimant attended in person and gave evidence, which the tribunal accepted together with the documents he had sent on 20 December 2022.
The tribunal found that the claimant had worked for the respondent for just under 25 weeks, from 24 February 2022 to 14 August 2022, and that his holiday year began on the first day of employment. He was entitled to 28 days' holiday, worked full time five days a week, averaging 55 hours per week, and took no annual leave during the employment. He also worked bank holidays without days in lieu. His gross weekly pay was £711.54, giving a daily rate for Working Time Regulations purposes of £142.31.
Applying regulation 14(3)(b) of the Working Time Regulations 1998, the tribunal calculated that 46.5% of the holiday year had expired at termination, so the accrued entitlement was 13.02 days. Multiplying that by the daily rate produced £1,852.88. The tribunal was satisfied there was sufficient information to make the calculation and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant that gross sum in respect of accrued untaken holiday.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holiday pay | Complaint was for failure to pay accrued but untaken holiday pay under Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations. Liability had already been determined; this judgment on remedy ordered payment of the gross sum. | Upheld | — | £1,853 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,853
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
- regulation 14(3)(b) Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.