Case 2501821/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mr. M. Strong v J.D. Gilroy and Sons (a partnership) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501821/2024
- Decision date
- 27 January 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
- Venue
- Newcastle Civil and Family Courts and Tribunal Centre via CVP
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr. M. Strong
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal found the claimant's complaint of an unlawful deduction from wages for non-payment of pay to be well founded. It declared the complaint upheld and ordered the respondent to pay £1,748 gross within 14 days, with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance.
The Tribunal also found the claimant's complaint concerning non-payment of holiday pay to be well founded. It ordered the respondent to pay £537.07 gross within 14 days, again with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment describes this as an unlawful deduction from wages for non-payment of pay and awards £1,748 gross. | Upheld | — | £1,748 |
| Holiday pay | The judgment describes this as an unlawful deduction from wages for non-payment of holiday pay and awards £537.07 gross. | Upheld | — | £537 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,285
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.