Case 2501823/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Ditta v Working Links — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501823/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shepherd Appearances
- Venue
- North Shields
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Ditta
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Ditta presented a claim against Working Links on 27 May 2019. The tribunal noted that the respondent name appeared to be a trading name and asked for the full name of the former employer. The claimant then identified Working Links (Employment) Ltd, said to be a company in administration, and the tribunal also asked about the relationship with Fedcap Ltd and whether the claim was against Working Links (Employment) Ltd, in which case consent of the administrator would be required to continue the claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal struck out the complaint of entitlement to redundancy pay after the claimant did not respond to directions and did not attend the hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal struck out the complaint of entitlement to notice pay on the same basis as the redundancy complaint. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.