Case 2501825/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss H Johnson v Mr K Graham & Mrs M Graham — 2019
- Case reference
- 2501825/2019
- Decision date
- 28 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Members
- Venue
- North Shields Hearing Centre
- Panel members
- Ms L Jackson, Mr J Adams
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss H Johnson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe employment tribunal at North Shields heard the claim on 6 and 7 November 2019 before Employment Judge Johnson with Ms L Jackson and Mr J Adams as members. The claimant, Miss H Johnson, brought complaints of direct disability discrimination under section 13 of the Equality Act 2010, discrimination arising from disability under section 15, and victimisation under section 27.
The tribunal unanimously found that the section 13 direct disability discrimination complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. It also unanimously found that the section 15 complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. The extracted judgment does not set out a fuller reasons section, so the detailed factual basis for those dismissals is not recorded in the text provided.
The victimisation complaint succeeded. The tribunal ordered the respondents, Mr K Graham and Mrs M Graham, to pay the claimant compensation of £1,709.76. The extracted judgment records that figure as a single compensation award and does not apportion it between different heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Complaint under section 13 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Disability discrimination | Complaint under section 15 Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Victimisation | Complaint under section 27 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal ordered compensation in the sum of £1,709.76, with no breakdown into separate heads of loss in the extracted text. | Upheld | — | £1,710 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,710
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,710
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
3 references- section 13 Equality Act 2010
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 27 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.