Case 2501859/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr H Worton v Miramar 246 Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501859/2023
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr H Worton
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr H Worton was employed by Miramar 246 Limited from 30 June 2020 to 3 May 2023 as a pizza chef. The respondent did not present a response, so the tribunal proceeded under rule 21 on the material available. The claimant's original claim form referred to redundancy payment, wrongful dismissal or notice pay, holiday pay, and arrears of pay, but the judgment expressly determined only the arrears-of-pay and notice-pay issues.
On the evidence before it, the tribunal found that the claimant worked an average of 38 hours a week at £10.50 an hour, with gross weekly pay of about £400 and net pay of about £349. It found that, at dismissal, the respondent had not paid for 90 hours worked in the previous two weeks, leaving £945 due by 5 May 2023, and that notice pay was also unpaid. The tribunal held that the unlawful deduction of wages claim and the breach of contract claim were well founded and succeeded.
The tribunal ordered the respondent to pay £945 gross for arrears of pay and £349 in damages for notice, each less any amount already paid by the Secretary of State in respect of the relevant element. The reasons state that the claimant was entitled to one week's notice of termination, while the operative paragraph refers to failure to give 2 weeks' notice; both passages support the award being for unpaid notice rather than any broader dismissal remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found 90 hours were unpaid in the previous two weeks, leaving £945 payable by 5 May 2023, ordered as a gross sum subject to any amount already paid by the Secretary of State in respect of arrears of pay. | Upheld | — | £945 |
| Breach of contract | The operative paragraph refers to failure to give 2 weeks' notice, while the reasons state the claimant was entitled to one week's notice of termination; the award was subject to any amount already paid by the Secretary of State in respect of notice. | Upheld | — | £349 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,294
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.