Case 2501875/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Mahmoud v Ashes Care Group Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501875/2024
- Decision date
- 27 November 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Childe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Mahmoud
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal dealt with the matter by strike-out rather than by deciding the underlying merits. It wrote to Mrs N Mahmoud on 17 September 2025 warning that it was considering striking out the claim because it appeared not to have been actively pursued, applying Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024.
The claimant did not reply to the warning letter and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal was satisfied that the grounds for strike-out under Rule 38 were made out and that strike-out was in accordance with the overriding objective in Rule 3. The claim was therefore struck out by Employment Judge Childe on 27 November 2025.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The Tribunal struck out the claim under Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because it had not been actively pursued. The claimant did not respond to the Tribunal's warning letter dated 17 September 2025 or request a hearing. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 38 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- Rule 3 overriding objective
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.