Mr G Thomas v Reed in Partnership — 2024

Case reference: 2501877/2023
Decision date: 13 September 2024
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Sweeney Date

Indexed: 21 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Mr G Thomas

Respondent

Reed in Partnership

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

At a preliminary hearing on 18 June 2024, the tribunal ordered the claimant to pay a deposit of £150.00 in relation to the disability discrimination complaint. The deposit order was sent to the claimant on 1 July 2024.

The claimant did not pay the deposit. As a result, the tribunal struck out the complaint of disability discrimination under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. The judgment records that the claim is now closed and does not determine the merits of the allegation.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Disability discrimination	The claimant was ordered to pay a deposit of £150.00 following a preliminary hearing on 18 June 2024. The order was sent on 1 July 2024, but the claimant failed to pay the deposit, so the disability discrimination complaint was struck out under rule 39(4) of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013.	Struck out	Disability	—

Legal tests applied

1 reference

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.