Case 2501879/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J De Vriess v Miramar 246 Limited (In voluntary liquidation) — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501879/2023
- Decision date
- 22 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J De Vriess
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr J De Vriess, was employed by Miramar 246 Limited from 08 November 2022 to 03 May 2023 as a waiter. He was dismissed without prior warning or notice by reason of redundancy. The claim form presented on 03 August 2023 referred to redundancy payment, wrongful dismissal, outstanding holiday pay and arrears of pay, but the judgment ultimately determined only the wage and holiday pay issues.
The respondent did not return a response by the response date, so the tribunal considered the case under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure. The tribunal recorded that the claimant was 19 years old at termination and was paid £7.49 an hour, the national minimum wage rate for his age. It found that, as at dismissal, the respondent had failed to pay him for 120.25 hours worked in the previous four weeks, made up of the hours set out in paragraph 7 of the reasons.
On that basis, the tribunal held that the claim of unauthorised deduction of wages was well-founded and succeeded. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum of £900.67. The tribunal said it had sufficient material to determine that claim properly.
The claim for payment of accrued but untaken holidays under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed. The tribunal noted that although the claimant indicated on the ET1 that he wished to pursue unpaid holiday pay, no details of such a claim were set out in the claim form and no further information was provided after the 05 December 2023 case management orders.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the claim for unauthorised deduction of wages well-founded and ordered payment of the gross sum of £900.67. | Upheld | — | £901 |
| Working time regulations | The claim for payment of accrued but untaken holidays under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 was dismissed because no details of any holiday claim were set out in the ET1 and no further information was provided after the case management order of 05 December 2023. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £901
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
2 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure
- regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.