Case 2501899/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Ryba v Perfect Polish Enterprises Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501899/2020
- Decision date
- 28 March 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Ryba
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMr A Ryba brought a notice-pay complaint, a holiday pay complaint under regulation 14 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, and a claim for arrears of pay which he later withdrew. The tribunal also considered whether the respondent had failed to provide a written statement of initial employment particulars, because that issue affected the remedy on the holiday pay claim.
On notice pay, the tribunal found that no contract of employment had been issued, so the claimant’s notice entitlement was the statutory minimum under section 86 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. Because he had been employed for more than one month but less than two years, he was entitled to one week’s notice. The tribunal found that he was in fact given two weeks’ notice from 12 June 2020 to 26 June 2020, so the breach of contract complaint failed.
On holiday pay, the tribunal found that the claimant’s leave year began on 6 July 2019 because there was no contractual provision fixing a different leave year. It accepted that he had taken 7 days’ leave, that he had been paid for four public holidays during furlough, and that his final pay included 8 hours’ holiday pay. Applying a 35-hour working week and an average five-day week, the tribunal calculated 191.20 hours accrued, deducted 71 hours taken or already paid, and awarded £1,048.14 at the agreed hourly rate of £8.72.
Because the respondent had not given the claimant a written statement of initial employment particulars, the tribunal applied section 38 of the Employment Act 2002 and added the minimum uplift of two weeks’ pay, £610.40. That brought the total award to £1,658.54. The arrears-of-pay claim was withdrawn and dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice-pay complaint under section 86 ERA 1996. The tribunal found the claimant was entitled only to the statutory minimum of one week’s notice and had in fact been given two weeks’ notice from 12 to 26 June 2020. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Regulation 14 WTR 1998 claim for accrued but untaken holiday at termination. The tribunal calculated £1,048.14 for holiday pay and then increased that award by £610.40 under section 38 Employment Act 2002 because no written statement of initial particulars had been given. | Upheld | — | £1,659 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Arrears-of-pay claim, pleaded as either a contract claim or under section 13 ERA 1996, was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,659
- across all upheld claims
- Compensatory award
- £1,048
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
7 references- section 86 Employment Rights Act 1996
- regulation 13 Working Time Regulations 1998
- regulation 14 Working Time Regulations 1998
- section 1(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 38 Employment Act 2002
- section 13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Article 3 Employment Tribunals Extension of Jurisdiction (England and Wales) Order 1994
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.