Case 2501899/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Rebecca Allan v You In Mind Homecare — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501899/2021
- Decision date
- 8 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Withers Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Rebecca Allan
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningOn 8 April 2022, Employment Judge Withers heard the matter remotely at Newcastle. Neither party attended or was represented. The tribunal recorded that the hearing was conducted by Cloud Video Platform and that a face-to-face hearing was not required because the matters could be determined remotely.
The tribunal struck out the claim. It had previously made an order dated 24 March 2022 giving the claimant an opportunity to make representations, or request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out because the claimant had not complied with previous tribunal orders and the claim had not been actively pursued.
The reasons identify one specific failure: on 18 January 2022 the claimant was required to provide the correct name of the respondent, but did not do so. The tribunal also noted that the claimant made no written representations, or any representations at all, in response to the strike-out warning and did not request a hearing. On that basis, the claim was struck out.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the substantive claim types in the reasons; it records only that the claim was struck out for non-compliance with previous orders and for not being actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.