Case 2501902/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss E Udofia v Cyrrus Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501902/2023
- Decision date
- 28 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Signed
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss E Udofia
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe only complaint identified in the judgment was breach of contract. The tribunal recorded that the claimant alleged the respondent breached her contract of employment by dismissing her, and that she sought to continue advancing a claim for damages on that basis.
The complaint was struck out because the claimant failed to pay the deposit she had been ordered to pay as a condition of being permitted to continue with the claim. The judgment does not record any substantive determination of the underlying breach of contract allegation.
No monetary award was made. The judgment is limited to the strike-out decision and does not contain any further remedy assessment, findings on liability, or other claims.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Struck out because the claimant failed to pay the deposit she had been ordered to pay as a condition of continuing to pursue damages for alleged breach of contract by dismissal. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.