Case 2501908/2021 · Employment Tribunal
MEG CORNER v Crown and Country Leisure Limited — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501908/2021
- Decision date
- 21 February 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge RODGER
- Venue
- NEWCASTLE UPON TYNE CIVIL AND FAMILY TRIBUNAL CENTRE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
MEG CORNER
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Rodger sat alone at Newcastle upon Tyne on 18 February 2022. The tribunal amended the ET1 so that the claimant's employment ended on 25 June 2021. The respondent did not attend or have representation at the hearing.
The claimant's claim for unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was dismissed because it was out of time. The claimant's claim for a redundancy payment under Part IX of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded and was upheld.
The respondent was ordered to pay the claimant £7,125.00. The judgment does not set out any separate apportionment of that sum between different heads of loss, and no other remedy was recorded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held this claim was out of time and dismissed it under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Redundancy | The claim under Part IX of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was found well-founded and succeeded in full. | Upheld | — | £7,125 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £7,125
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.