Case 2501914/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v The Great North Air Ambulance Service — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501914/2021
- Decision date
- 19 April 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard by Employment Judge Martin at Newcastle Employment Tribunal on 11 and 12 April 2022 by CVP. The claimant was represented by Mr D Flood and the respondent by Ms S Brewis. No lay members are listed, so this appears to have been a judge-alone hearing.
The only outcome recorded in the judgment is that the claimant's unfair dismissal complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal. The reasons explain that during the hearing the claimant decided to withdraw her claim and did not attend the second day. Her counsel told the tribunal that she had decided to withdraw her claim of constructive unfair dismissal and was content for the proceedings to be dismissed upon withdrawal.
No remedy was awarded and no findings were made on the merits of the dismissal claim. The judgment therefore records a withdrawal rather than a determination of liability.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the complaint of unfair dismissal was dismissed upon withdrawal. In the reasons, the tribunal records that the claimant withdrew her claim of constructive unfair dismissal during the hearing. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.