Case 2501921/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr F Robinson v CDC Holdings (Yarm) Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501921/2023
- Decision date
- 10 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr F Robinson
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr F Robinson, brought complaints of unlawful deductions from wages and failure to provide an itemised pay statement against CDC Holdings (Yarm). The respondent did not attend or provide representation at the hearing on 3 November 2023, which took place by CVP before Employment Judge Martin.
The tribunal found that the complaint of unlawful deductions from wages was well founded and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £312. It also found that the complaint about failure to provide an itemised pay statement was well founded. The judgment does not set out any separate monetary award for the pay statement complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £312 |
| Other | Complaint of failure to provide an itemised pay statement was found well founded; the judgment did not state a separate monetary award for this complaint. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £312
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.