Case 2501922/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Arthur v The Protector Group Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501922/2020
- Decision date
- 8 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Lynn
- Venue
- Remotely
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Arthur
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis decision dealt only with the Claimant's application for costs. The tribunal found that the application was partially well founded and ordered the Respondent, The Protector Group Ltd, to pay the Claimant £2,000 in respect of costs.
The hearing was listed remotely by Cloud Video Platform on 31 August, 1, 2 September and 4 October 2021. The written record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days of the written record being sent.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal considered the Claimant's application for costs under rules 75 to 78 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 and held that it was partially well founded, ordering the Respondent to pay £2,000 in costs. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rules 75 to 78 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution & Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.