Case 2501930/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss D Griffin v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501930/2023
- Decision date
- 8 January 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss D Griffin
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard the matter remotely by CVP on 8 January 2024. The claimant appeared in person and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
The judgment records that the respondent's application to strike out the claimant's claims under Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013 was refused. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written reasons were provided in the judgment because no request for written reasons had been made at the hearing.
The judgment does not determine the substantive unfair dismissal claim and does not address remedy.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment refused the respondent's Rule 37 strike-out application. It did not determine the merits or final outcome of the unfair dismissal claim. | Other | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.