Case 2501932/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Mr P Sansum v Royal Mail Group Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501932/2020
- Decision date
- 9 September 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Langridge
- Venue
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr P Sansum
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal dismissed the claimant's claim that he had been unfairly dismissed under Section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996, finding that claim was not well-founded.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed for reasons of conduct and that the dismissal was fair and reasonable under section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996. No remedy was awarded.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim to have been unfairly dismissed under Section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996 was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the claimant was dismissed for reasons of conduct and that the dismissal was fair and reasonable under section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Section 100 Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.