Case 2501945/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Callum Swain v Magnetic North Group Limited — 2023
- Case reference
- 2501945/2023
- Decision date
- 13 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Callum Swain
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing held at Newcastle CFCTC by CVP on 10 November 2023, Employment Judge Johnson heard the claimant, Mr Callum Swain, in person. The respondent, Magnetic North Group Limited, did not attend and no response had been received; the judgment notes that the company was in liquidation.
The tribunal held that the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period from 1 June 2023 to 30 June 2023 and ordered payment of the gross sum deducted, £3,652.56. The claimant was responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that sum.
The tribunal also held that the holiday pay complaint was well-founded. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction by failing to pay for holidays accrued but not taken when the claimant's employment ended, and ordered payment of £444.23 in respect of accrued holiday pay. The claimant was again responsible for any tax or national insurance due on that payment.
The total sum ordered to be paid by the respondent to the claimant was £4,096.79. The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages for the period 1 June 2023 to 30 June 2023. | Upheld | — | £3,653 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction because accrued but untaken holiday was not paid on termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £444 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,097
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.