Case 2501952/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Ms E Davison (First Claimant) v Serenity H2O Ltd (First Respondent) — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501952/2021
- Decision date
- 12 December 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Shore Appearances
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms E Davison (First Claimant)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Newcastle remotely in public by video on 11 August 2022 before Employment Judge Shore. The written record states that neither party appeared at the final hearing.
The tribunal dismissed the claimant’s claim of unauthorised deduction of wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, finding that it was not well-founded. It also dismissed the claim for payment of holidays accrued but not taken at the date of dismissal, again recording that the claim was not well-founded.
The unfair dismissal claim was also dismissed. The written record notes that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the note on the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.