Case 2501961/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss M Sargent v DCS Multiserve Limited — 2021
- Case reference
- 2501961/2020
- Decision date
- 27 January 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge A.M.S. Green
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss M Sargent
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 27 January 2021 before Employment Judge A.M.S. Green, the parties told the tribunal that terms of settlement had been agreed. The judgment records that the case was adjourned until 4 pm on 24 February 2021 so that those terms could be carried into effect.
The tribunal did not determine the underlying unlawful deduction from wages complaint on its merits. Instead, it provided that if the claimant did not apply to restore the matter to the hearing list by the adjourned date and time, the claim would be treated as having been withdrawn on settlement by the claimant.
The judgment also records that, with the claimant's consent given on 27 January 2021, the claim would stand dismissed without order if no restoration application was made by that deadline. No financial award was recorded in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The parties had agreed terms of settlement. The tribunal adjourned the case until 4 pm on 24 February 2021 for those terms to be carried into effect. The judgment states that if the claimant did not apply to restore the matter by then, the claim would be treated as withdrawn on settlement by the claimant and would stand dismissed without order. | Settled | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.