Case 2501968/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms N Lumley v North Yorkshire County Council — 2020
- Case reference
- 2501968/2020
- Decision date
- 11 December 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson REPRESENTATION
- Venue
- Teeside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms N Lumley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal heard only the claimant’s complaint of unfair constructive dismissal after her application to amend to add disability discrimination allegations was withdrawn. The tribunal identified the claimant’s case as alleging that the respondent’s suspension, investigation, disciplinary process, treatment of her grievances, and approach to her health conditions cumulatively destroyed trust and confidence and led to her resignation on 26 August 2020.
The tribunal found that the respondent was entitled to investigate concerns that came to light during the claimant’s sickness absence, to suspend her on full pay on her return to work, and to deal with her two grievances within the disciplinary process because they concerned the same subject matter. It found the investigation was lengthy but not unreasonable given the volume and complexity of documents, the number of witnesses interviewed, the investigator’s other duties, and the COVID-19 restrictions. It also found the investigation and disciplinary process were conducted fairly and reasonably.
The tribunal further found that the disciplinary panel did take the claimant’s health issues into account, including as mitigation when deciding to impose sanctions short of dismissal. It rejected the claimant’s contention that the process had been prejudged and concluded that none of the matters relied on amounted to a fundamental breach of contract or a breach of the implied term of trust and confidence. The complaint of unfair constructive dismissal was therefore dismissed.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constructive dismissal | The only substantive claim heard was unfair constructive dismissal. The claimant withdrew her application to amend to add disability discrimination allegations, so those allegations were not adjudicated. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
8 references- s.94 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.95 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.98 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Western Excavating (ECC) Ltd v Sharp
- Malik v Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA
- Kaur v Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
- Morrow v Safeway Stores Ltd
- Blackburn v Aldi Stores Ltd
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.