Case 2501969/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Miss A Rollins v Utility Alliance Ltd in administration Interested Party: Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy — 2022
- Case reference
- 2501969/2021
- Decision date
- 15 June 2022
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Speker OBE
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss A Rollins
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss A Rollins brought a claim for a protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 after her employment with Utility Alliance Ltd ended on or about 11 January 2021. She said she had understood that she had been included in the collective claims already presented on behalf of other employees, and only discovered that she was not included after seeing social media posts about successful tribunal claims on 21 or 22 December 2021 and checking with Mr Jonathan Pullarp and ACAS.
The tribunal applied section 189(5) and found that it was not reasonably practicable for the claimant to present her complaint within the original three-month period beginning with 12 February 2021, because she had reasonable grounds for believing that her claim had already been issued. It also found that she presented the claim within such further period as was reasonable, namely within two days of discovering that she had not been included. The tribunal checked the schedule attached to the earlier December 2021 orders and found that her name, and the names of some Newcastle colleagues she identified, were not included.
On the merits, the tribunal found that the respondent had failed to comply with the consultation obligations under sections 188 and 188A in relation to the redundancies, and that the claimant was therefore entitled to a protective award. It ordered remuneration for the protected period of 90 days from 12 February 2021 to 13 May 2021. The claimant stated that her daily rate of pay was £91, producing an award of £8,190, and the order was subject to the Recoupment Regulations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Protective award under section 189 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The tribunal held it was not reasonably practicable to present the claim within three months because the claimant reasonably believed she had already been included in the existing multiple claims. The award was for 90 days' pay at a daily rate of £91, subject to the Recoupment Regulations. | Upheld | — | £8,190 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £8,190
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.189(5) TULRCA 1992
- s.188 TULRCA 1992
- s.188A TULRCA 1992
- s.190 TULRCA 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.