Case 2501976/2024 · Employment Tribunal
E Bradley v EE Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2501976/2024
- Decision date
- 12 December 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heather
Parties
2 namedClaimant
E Bradley
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Tribunal struck out the claim. It recorded that an Order sent on 12 December 2025 warned Mrs Bradley that the Tribunal was considering strike out because it appeared, applying Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024, that the claim had not been actively pursued.
The Tribunal stated that Mrs Bradley did not reply to the Order, had not complied with earlier Orders made at the 11 April 2025 hearing, did not attend the 29 October 2025 hearing, and had not explained those matters. It found that a fair hearing could not take place because the claimant had not actively pursued the claim and the circumstances suggested that was unlikely to change.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim after noting that the claimant had only ticked boxes identifying the types of claims and had not provided details. | Struck out | Disability | — |
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim after noting that the claimant had only ticked boxes identifying the types of claims and had not provided details. | Struck out | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
| Redundancy | The judgment struck out the claim after noting that the claimant had only ticked boxes identifying the types of claims and had not provided details. | Struck out | — | — |
| Sex discrimination | The judgment struck out the claim after noting that the claimant had only ticked boxes identifying the types of claims and had not provided details. | Struck out | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment struck out the claim after noting that the claimant had only ticked boxes identifying the types of claims and had not provided details. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 37 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective in Rule 3
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.