Case 2501979/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Ms. M.Satterthwaite v County Durham and Darlington NHS Trust — 2024
- Case reference
- 2501979/2023
- Decision date
- 27 August 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge T.R. Smith
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms. M.Satterthwaite
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing on 27 August 2024 at The Newcastle Civil and Family Courts and Tribunal Centre via CVP, Employment Judge T.R. Smith heard the matter with Ms. M. Satterthwaite appearing in person and the respondent represented by Mr Price of counsel. The written decision records that the claimant's claim in case 2501979/2023 was struck out in its entirety pursuant to rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not set out the underlying factual allegations or any substantive findings on liability. It is a short procedural disposal only, and no remedy or monetary award was made.
The record also states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the usual post-hearing procedure.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment does not identify the underlying substantive cause of action in the extracted text. It records only that the claimant's claim in case 2501979/2023 was struck out in its entirety pursuant to rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.