Neil Ackinclose v Auxilis Limited — 2022

Case reference: 2501999/2020
Decision date: 7 January 2022
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge Beever
Venue: By CVP

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Neil Ackinclose

Respondent

Auxilis Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

Employment Judge Beever sat alone at a CVP hearing on 13, 14 and 15 December 2021. The only claim recorded in the judgment was Neil Ackinclose’s claim for unfair dismissal under sections 94 and 98 of the ERA.

The tribunal held that the unfair dismissal claim was not well founded. The judgment gives no further reasoning in the extracted text, and no monetary remedy was awarded.

Accordingly, the claim was dismissed in full.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unfair dismissal pursuant to section 94 and 98 ERA was not well founded and was dismissed.	Dismissed	—	—

Legal tests applied

2 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.