Case 2502002/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Claimant v Map Group (UK) Ltd and Utility Services (NE) Ltd (in administration) — 2025
- Case reference
- 2502002/2023
- Decision date
- 10 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Jeram Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Claimant
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant withdrew the claim against the first respondent, and that claim was dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal recorded that, having secured consent to proceed with the complaint, the unfair dismissal claim against the second respondent succeeded. The judgment awarded the claimant GBP 30,426.39, but did not provide a breakdown of the award because reasons were given orally.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recordedThis case has mixed outcomes under at least one legal claim type. A tribunal can uphold some allegations and dismiss others under the same legal head, so rows below may represent separate issues or allegation groups from the judgment.
| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The claim against the first respondent was dismissed upon withdrawal by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The unfair dismissal complaint against the second respondent succeeded after consent to proceed was secured. | Upheld | — | £30,426 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £30,426
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.