Case 2502045/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Leah Donachie First Claimant Miss Nichola Selby Second Claimant Miss Rhona Parker Third Claimant v Michelle Rutley (T/A Magic Mops) — 2019
- Case reference
- 2502045/2019
- Decision date
- 1 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- Teesside Justice Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Leah Donachie First Claimant Miss Nichola Selby Second Claimant Miss Rhona Parker Third Claimant
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Leah Donachie's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was not determined on the merits. The judgment records that the complaint was dismissed upon withdrawal by the first claimant.
The respondent's contract counter claim against all three claimants was also dismissed. The tribunal recorded that it had no jurisdiction to hear that claim.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the first claimant's complaint of unauthorised deduction from wages was dismissed upon withdrawal by the first claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The respondent's contract counter claim against all three claimants was dismissed because the Employment Tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.