Case 2502047/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Davies v George Allinson Transport Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502047/2023
- Decision date
- 24 November 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Gowland Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Davies
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal amended the ET1 to show the correct respondent as George Allinson Transport Ltd, noting that no prejudice was caused because the respondent had received and responded to the claim. The respondent's application to strike out the claim was refused.
The sole substantive complaint was one of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II of the Employment Rights Act 1996, said to arise in respect of a deduction. The tribunal held that complaint was not well-founded and dismissed it. Written reasons were not provided because reasons were given orally at the hearing and no written request was made within the period stated in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The complaint was recorded as a complaint of unauthorised deductions from pay contrary to Part II Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of a deduction. It was found not well-founded and dismissed. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.