Case 2502077/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs H J Gowland v BusinessWorks International Limited Interested Party: Secretary of State for Business & Trade — 2023
- Case reference
- 2502077/2023
- Decision date
- 14 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Sweeney Appearances
- Venue
- Newcastle
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs H J Gowland
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant presented her claim on 11 September 2023. The reasons record that she had set up the respondent business in 2018 and was its major shareholder and director. The claim was brought in respect of a redundancy payment, arrears of pay, notice pay and holiday pay. The respondent did not serve a response, but the Secretary of State, joined as an interested party, resisted the claims.
The tribunal made directions on 12 October 2023 requiring the claimant to provide documents and a witness statement. Employment Judge Jeram later directed her to continue to comply and specifically to address why she said she was an employee or worker, but she did not prepare a file, send documents, or provide a witness statement. The Secretary of State then arranged an indexed bundle and asked her to send her witness statement, but there was no response.
The claimant sought postponements of the hearing on 3 December 2023 and again on 13 December 2023. Those applications were refused by Judges Loy and Aspden, and Employment Judge Sweeney declined to postpone the hearing further because there had been no material change of circumstances and the claimant still had not complied with the earlier directions. The reasons also note emails from the claimant referring to mental health issues.
After considering Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013, the claim form, the available information, and the absence of any witness statement or documents from the claimant, the tribunal dismissed the proceedings. No merits findings were made on employee or worker status, entitlement to redundancy pay, arrears of pay, notice pay, or holiday pay.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The judgment records a complaint for a redundancy payment, but the proceedings were dismissed under Rule 47 after the claimant failed to attend and had not complied with directions. No merits finding was made. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment refers to arrears of pay, but it does not determine the substantive merits. The claim was dismissed under Rule 47 because the claimant did not attend and had not provided the ordered documents or witness statement. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment records a notice pay complaint, but it does not reach any contractual merits finding. The proceedings were dismissed under Rule 47 following the claimant's non-attendance and non-compliance with case management orders. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment records a holiday pay complaint, but it was dismissed under Rule 47 without any substantive findings because the claimant did not attend the hearing and had not complied with directions. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.