Case 2502085/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms J Ross v Sedge Funding Ltd — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502085/2020
- Decision date
- 9 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Martin Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms J Ross
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMs J Ross brought claims against Sedge Funding Ltd for breach of contract in respect of notice pay, unlawful deductions from wages, and breach of the Working Time Regulations in respect of holiday pay. The case was heard by CVP on 19 January and 8 February 2021 before Employment Judge Martin, who found all three complaints well founded.
The tribunal awarded £461.54 gross for notice pay, £2,215.39 gross for unpaid wages covering 10 August 2020 to 10 September 2020, and £263.73 for holiday pay. The awards for breach of contract and unlawful deduction from wages were then uplifted by 10% for failure to follow the ACAS Code of Practice, producing an additional £267.69. The total sum ordered was £3,208.35.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Notice pay. | Upheld | — | £462 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unpaid wages for the period 10 August 2020 to 10 September 2020. | Upheld | — | £2,215 |
| Working time regulations | Holiday pay. | Upheld | — | £264 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,208
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- ACAS Code of Practice
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.