Case 2502126/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss G Maddison v GIG Hospitality Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 2502126/2024
- Decision date
- 30 April 2025
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Arullendran Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle CFCTC
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss G Maddison
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Arullendran heard the case by CVP on 30 April 2025. The claimant was represented by her mother; the respondent did not attend. The Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded, holding that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages in the period June to October 2024, and ordered the respondent to pay the claimant the gross sum deducted of £1,069.21, with the claimant responsible for any tax or national insurance.
The Tribunal further found that when proceedings were begun the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide the claimant with a written statement of employment particulars. The Judge concluded there were no exceptional circumstances making an award of two weeks' gross pay unjust or inequitable, and that it was just and equitable to make an award equivalent to four weeks' gross pay under section 38 of the Employment Act 2002, amounting to £732.72.
The total award was £1,801.93. Reasons were given orally at the hearing and written reasons were not requested, so none were provided.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Tribunal found the complaint of unauthorised deductions from wages well-founded for the period June to October 2024; gross sum deducted ordered to be paid, with claimant responsible for tax and NI. | Upheld | — | £1,069 |
| Other | Breach of duty to provide a written statement of employment particulars; award made under section 38 Employment Act 2002 of 4 weeks' gross pay. Not a standalone §4.4 enum value, so classified as 'other'. | Upheld | — | £733 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,802
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 38 Employment Act 2002
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.