Case 2502150/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Miss CA Graham v High Howdon Social Club and Institute — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502150/2020
- Decision date
- 26 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Morris
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss CA Graham
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Morris, sitting alone at Newcastle Hearing Centre on 22 and 23 July 2021, held that Miss CA Graham’s unfair dismissal complaint under section 111 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was well-founded. The judgment records that she had terminated her contract in circumstances said to fall within section 95(1)(c), and that the dismissal was unfair contrary to sections 94 and 98 of the Act.
The tribunal awarded compensation of £4,870.78 for the unfair dismissal. That sum was made up of a basic award of £1,653 and a compensatory award of £3,217.78. The judgment also states that the Recoupment Regulations did not apply to the award.
The separate complaint under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998, concerning alleged underpayment of holiday pay, was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. No separate monetary award was made on that complaint.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Claim under section 111 ERA 1996 succeeded; tribunal held the claimant was dismissed within section 95(1)(c) and that the dismissal was unfair contrary to section 94 by reference to section 98. | Upheld | — | £4,871 |
| Holiday pay | Complaint under regulation 30 of the Working Time Regulations 1998 that the respondent failed to pay the full holiday pay due was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £4,871
- across all upheld claims
- Basic award
- £1,653
- statutory, unfair dismissal
- Compensatory award
- £3,218
- compensatory remedy recorded
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.95(1)(c) ERA 1996
- s.94 ERA 1996
- s.98 ERA 1996
- Regulation 30 Working Time Regulations 1998
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.