Case 2502166/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Charlotte Walker v Marine Management Organisation Record of an Attended Preliminary Hearing at the Employment Tribunal — 2024
- Case reference
- 2502166/2023
- Decision date
- 6 June 2024
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hutchinson
- Venue
- Nottingham Heard
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Charlotte Walker
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was an attended preliminary hearing in Mrs Charlotte Walker's claims against the Marine Management Organisation, heard by Employment Judge Hutchinson sitting alone. The written judgment records that the claimant's breach of contract claim for notice pay was withdrawn and dismissed. No monetary award was made on that claim.
The tribunal also decided that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the unfair dismissal claim, and that claim was dismissed. The record states that reasons had been given orally at the hearing, and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in time, so the short written judgment does not set out further factual or legal analysis.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The claim was for notice pay. The judgment records that it was withdrawn and dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal held that it did not have jurisdiction to hear the claim and dismissed it. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.