Case 2502167/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Ms S Orfi v London HB Limited (in liquidation) — 2021
- Case reference
- 2502167/2020
- Decision date
- 25 February 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Representation
- Venue
- Newcastle Hearing Centre
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Ms S Orfi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing on 11 February 2021 at Newcastle Hearing Centre, before Employment Judge Johnson, the claimant Ms S Orfi succeeded on three monetary claims against London HB Limited (in liquidation). The tribunal held that her complaint of unlawful deduction from wages was well-founded and ordered payment of £3,725.00 net, held that her complaint of failure to pay accrued holiday pay was well-founded and ordered payment of £467.00 net, and held that her breach of contract complaint for failure to pay notice pay was well-founded and ordered payment of £2,023.00 net.
The judgment records that all other claims were dismissed. It does not give a separate breakdown beyond the three net sums awarded, and it does not identify the dismissed claims individually in the text supplied.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found the complaint of unlawful deduction from wages well-founded and ordered payment of £3,725.00 net. | Upheld | — | £3,725 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the complaint of failure to pay accrued holiday pay well-founded and ordered payment of £467.00 net. | Upheld | — | £467 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found the breach of contract complaint for failure to pay notice pay well-founded and ordered payment of £2,023.00 net. | Upheld | — | £2,023 |
| Other | The judgment states that all other claims were dismissed, but it does not identify those claims individually. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,215
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.